Tuesday, 24 July 2012

Batman - Life after Nolan

So the Dark Knight has finally risen, Bale has hung up the cowl, and Christopher Nolan has rounded off his take on the Batman story with a satisfying conclusion. People are already talking about Warners Bros’ inevitable reboot/remake of the cash cow franchise and, for once, I am okay with that. In fact, I’m excited.

One character, many versions
Yes, yes, I know that I ranted about Hollywood remaking the same fantasy film endlessly in my last post but I think there is scope in the Batman franchise for a new and interesting direction. Nolan’s trilogy was (mostly) excellent but it was also limited in specific ways. And that’s the strength of Batman as a character. He is like Tarzan or Sherlock Holmes, a character with essential core traits that can be interpreted and portrayed in a variety of ways, be it the campy pantomime of 60s TV, the noir-flavoured adventures of the 90s animated series, or Nolan’s brooding realism. There are elements of the character that simply didn’t fit in the recent films and I’d like to see some of them on the silver screen. With that in mind, here is my personal wish list for the next big screen Batman.

1        No origin story

I think we can all agree that the superhero origin story has been pretty thoroughly covered. We have had reluctant heroes, idealistic heroes, accidental heroes, patriotic heroes, and repentant heroes. The Amazing Spiderman might have surprised everyone by making a retelling of Peter Parker’s origin watchable, only ten years after it was first seen in the cinema, but there are few changes to be wrung out of Batman’s origin story – dead parents, obsessive quest for justice, a bulk order of fetish gear and military hardware. Nolan did a bang up job putting that on screen. Besides, is there going to be anybody in the cinema who doesn’t know who the basics? Let’s follow Tim Burton’s example and jump straight into an established Gotham City, with Batman already an active superhero.

2        Make it a comic book movie

This is a very subjective point but, personally, I’d rate Batman Begins as the best of the Nolan trilogy. The other two may be more ambitious and more sophisticated pieces of cinema, but Begins is just more fun to watch. It has a clear story with strong characters and some great action. And while it is brooding and thoughtful, it never gets lost in the navel gazing. Batman is arguable the ‘darkest’ mainstream superhero; his stories explore areas that other superhero comics won’t explore. But he’s still a guy fighting crime dressed as a bat. As SFX magazine once said, Batman is not just the Dark Knight: he’s also the Caped Crusader and the World’s Greatest Detective.

So, for the reboot, I’d like to see a Batman film that embraces more of the fantastical weirdness that you only find in comic books. Yes, Batman battles urban terrorists and mobsters but he’s also tangled with giant crocodile-man monsters and immortal ninja warriors. The benchmark should be something like: ‘Could this Batman conceivably join the Justice League?’ The only way somebody like Superman could have appeared in Nolan’s Gotham was if Bruce Wayne took some very strong LSD.

3        Robin

Robin for the 21st century -
 say 'Jimmy Jillickers' to him and he'll break your legs
I love the 60s Batman series, with its campiness and knowing humour, but it has made it difficult for people to take the Boy Wonder seriously ever since. Think about The Simpsons’ painfully accurate parody, Fallout Boy. It does not help that the last time he appeared on big screen (apart from a fan-pleasing nod in The Dark Knight Rises) it was in Schumacher’s generally reviled Batman and Robin. But I think there is potential for the character to feature in a reboot. He could add levity to the films by playing off against Batman, the dead panning straight man. Robin could also serve as the audience’s way into this new Batman franchise, as he goes on his own journey to become the Boy Wonder. Hell, why not use Tim Drake’s origin story: he works out Batman’s secret identity and demands the job of sidekick?

4        The Riddler

Riddler is one of Batman’s most enduring and iconic villains, right up there with Joker and Penguin, but he’s had a troubled history both on page and screen. This is mainly because his central gimmick – leaving riddles at the scene of his crimes – is difficult to write well. But I think that Rocksteady Studio’s Arkham videogames have shown that, not only can the Riddler be an effective villain, he can be terrifying. The Rocksteady games, particularly Arkham City, portrayed the Riddler as a narcissistic sociopath obsessed with proving his intellectual superiority to all and sundry, but especially Batman. He kidnaps people and places them in sadistic death traps reminiscent of the Saw films, justifying his actions by claiming that his victims would have survived if they had been smarter. Add his kung fu kicking female sidekicks, Query and Echo, for some muscle and fanservice, and you’ve got a big screen villain.

'I'll get you next time, Batman!'

I can already envisage this new, more swashbuckling Batman film – told from the perspective of precocious teenager Tim Drake, he becomes determined to find out the secret identity of his idol, the Batman, an established superhero with a history of crime fighting in Gotham City. Meanwhile Batman, in partnership with Commissioner Gordon, is investigating a spree of burglaries by a mysterious criminal who leaves riddles at the scene of his crimes. As Batman solves more of his clues, the Riddler raises the stakes by kidnapping civilians and forcing Batman to negotiate his death mazes to save them. The overarching theme would be questions of identity – who is Batman, who is the Riddler, who is Tim Drake – and the finale would have the whole of Gotham City Hall turned into one giant death trap that Batman and his new sidekick Robin have to negotiate to save the mayor, or something like that. Add in an arc plot for the franchise involving Hugo Strange as a master puppeteer and you’re done. Hell, I’ll write it for them!

Monday, 16 July 2012

Formulaic fantasy - How Joe Roth is stifling a genre

Who is Joe Roth? He is a Hollywood producer, with a long list of successful films on his CV, including the Tim Burton's Alice in Wonderland and Snow White and the Huntsman. I mention him because when the trailer for Sam Raimi’s new film, Oz the Great and Powerful, was revealed last week, it announced that it is ‘From the producer of Alice in Wonderland’: Joe Roth. Here is the trailer:



Anybody else getting a sense of déjà vu? We only have a few minutes of footage, but it looks like Mr Roth is giving us the same basic film again. The set dressing might have changed but the essential plot is another rehash of the Narnia story. A plucky and/or innocent character is transported to a magical fairy tale land under the dominion of a card-carrying villain. There is a chase and an escape. The protagonist meets some ‘wacky’ supporting characters, raises an army, there is a battle, evil is defeated, and it ends with the inevitable sequel hook.

I actually walked out of Snow White the Huntsman when I saw it in the cinema. I am a sucker for heroic fantasy but a combination of Kristen Stewart’s excruciatingly bland performance and the sheer mind-numbing, clichéd nature of the whole thing was too much. It made Avatar look like ground-breaking story telling. Prequel, sequel, reboot, reimaging; call it what you like, it’s the same film every time. Everybody is just wearing different hats.

Come to think of it, most of the changes that Disney made to A Princess of Mars when they adapted it as the much maligned John Carter seemed purposefully designed to fit this formula. In the book, Mars is a world in decline; its ecosystem has been devastated, forcing the various city states to fight constantly for ever dwindling resources. Apparently this was too subtle for the film makers. There simply has to be a card-carrying, world-threatening villain, so the city of Zodanga is now responsible for all the world’s problems, manipulated behind the scenes by the Therns. The director has already made a children’s film with powerful eco-message, WALL:E. Why did he shy away from the same message in John Carter? I suspect it was to appease the all-powerful formula.
Formula can be good. It’s essential to some genres. Almost all detective stories share some basic elements: a culprit, a detective, a mystery to be solved. It’s the variations, or lack of them, that make an individual work good or bad. But fantasy? Fantasy is supposed to be the one genre where rules and conventions no longer apply. Even science fiction (of the ‘hard’ type, at least) is bound by what is at least theoretically possible. Fantasy is only limited by the story teller’s imagination. And modern special effects have given us an unprecedented ability to put the limits of our invention on the silver screen. So why does Hollywood insist on churning out the same story over and over and over again? I suspect the answer is about box office returns. Innovation is risky. Innovation does not test well in the focus groups. The movie-going public likes familiarity; likes ‘brand recognition’. But then how did something like Inception, innovative and original, become a hit? Hollywood should give the public more credit.

At the very least, they should stop revisiting the classics! Does anybody really think that Sam Raimi is going to make a film on par with the original Wizard of Oz? We’ve got some pretty definitive versions of Alice in Wonderland and Snow White on screen. Let’s see some new adaptations; books we haven’t seen on the big screen yet.
 
What about a film starring Fritz Leiber’s barbarian hero Fafhrd and his partner in crime, the Grey Mauser? They’d be ideal for a swashbuckling heist film. Or a film of one of the Chrestomanci books by Diana Wynne Jones; a dimension-hopping, Doctor Who-style adventure with the titular wizard? Maybe look at the works of Tim Powers, a personal favourite of mine, like The Anubis Gates (time travel, Regency London and Egyptian sorcery) or The Drawing of the Dark (magical beer and Arthurian legend in 16th century Vienna)? Or Jim Butcher’s The Dresden Files; a noir detective thriller with vampires and black magic?
 There you go Hollywood. You can have those ideas for free. Just don’t let Joe Roth get his hands on them.